Skip navigation
Veuillez utiliser cette adresse pour citer ce document : http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/48119
Fichier(s) constituant ce document :
Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.
Titre: Efficacy of cognitive training on executive functions in healthy older adults : a systematic review with meta analysis of randomized controlled tria
Auteur(s): Olegário, Raphael Lopes
Fernandes, Sarah Ribeiro
Moraes Júnior, Rui de
metadata.dc.contributor.affiliation: University of Brasília, Institute of Psychology
University of Brasília, Postgraduate Program in Behavioural Sciences
University of Brasília, Institute of Psychology
University of Brasília, Institute of Psychology
University of Brasília, Postgraduate Program in Behavioural Sciences
Assunto:: Idosos
Meta-análise
Envelhecimento
Date de publication: 12-oct-2023
Editeur: Taylor & Francis
Référence bibliographique: OLEGÁRIO, Raphael Lopes; FERNANDES, Sarah Ribeiro; MORAES JR, Rui de. Efficacy of cognitive training on executive functions in healthy older adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychology & Health, [S. l.], 1–28, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2267610. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08870446.2023.2267610. Acesso em: 23 maio 2024.
Abstract: Objective: Systematically review randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of cognitive training on executive functions in healthy older people. Measures: The outcome measures were related to inhibitory con trol, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. Results: Thirty-one trials were included in the systematic review and thirteen trials in the meta-analysis. In the overall analysis, the cognitive training enhanced inhibitory control when measured by the Stroop task (p < .001, d=1.64) and working memory when measured by the Corsi Block task (p=.002, d = .16). A marginal significance was found for working memory in the Digit Span task – Forward (p= .06, d = .92). However, cognitive training did not enhance inhibitory control when measured by the Go/No-Go task (p=.76, d = .59), working memory when measured by the Digit Span – Backward (p= .72, d = .95) and N-Back (p=.10, d = .26) tasks, and cognitive flexibility when measured by Trail Making – Part B (p= .08, d = .27) and Semantic Fluency (p = .49, d = .06) tasks. Conclusion: Mixed evidence was found for inhibitory control and working memory; cognitive flexibility showed no evidence of improvement.
metadata.dc.description.unidade: Instituto de Psicologia (IP)
Departamento de Processos Psicológicos Básicos (IP PPB)
metadata.dc.description.ppg: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências do Comportamento
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2267610
metadata.dc.relation.publisherversion: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08870446.2023.2267610
Collection(s) :Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Affichage détaillé " class="statisticsLink btn btn-primary" href="/jspui/handle/10482/48119/statistics">



Tous les documents dans DSpace sont protégés par copyright, avec tous droits réservés.