Skip navigation
Veuillez utiliser cette adresse pour citer ce document : http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/39790
Fichier(s) constituant ce document :
Fichier Description TailleFormat 
ARTIGO_BarriersFacilitatorsStrengthening.pdf1,25 MBAdobe PDFVoir/Ouvrir
Titre: Barriers and facilitators in the Strengthening Families Program (SFP 10–14) implementation process in northeast Brazil : a retrospective qualitative study
Auteur(s): Abdala, Ingrid Gomes
Murta, Sheila Giardini
Menezes, Jordana Calil Lopes de
Nobre-Sandoval, Larissa de Almeida
Gomes, Maria do Socorro Mendes
Duailibe, Karina Damous
Farias, Danielle Aranha
metadata.dc.identifier.orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8822-5540
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6217-6218
Assunto:: Avaliação de processo
Drogas - abuso - prevenção
Adolescentes - drogas - abuso
Intervenção familiar
Date de publication: 24-sep-2020
Editeur: MDPI
Référence bibliographique: ABDALA, Ingrid Gomes et al. Barriers and facilitators in the Strengthening Families Program (SFP 10–14) implementation process in northeast Brazil: a retrospective qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 17, n. 19, 6979, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17196979. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/6979. Acesso em: 24 dez. 2020.
Abstract: This study analyzed contextual barriers and facilitators in the implementation of Strengthening Families Program (SFP 10–14), Brazilian version, a family-based preventive program focused on the prevention of risk behaviors for adolescent health. SFP 10–14 was implemented between 2016 and 2017 for socioeconomically vulnerable families in four Northeast Brazilian states as a tool of the National Drug Policy. A retrospective qualitative study was carried out in which 26 implementation agents participated. Data from 16 individual interviews and two group interviews were analyzed through content analysis. The most recurrent barriers were the group facilitators’ working conditions, weak municipal administration, precarious infrastructure, inadequate group facilitator training methodologies, low adherence of managers and professionals, and funding scarcity. The conditions highlighted as favorable to the implementation were proper intersectoral coordination, engagement of involved actors, awareness of public agency administrators, municipal management efficacy, and efficient family recruitment strategies. Favorable political contexts, engagement of implementation agents, and intersectoral implementation strategies were identified as central to the success of the implementation of SFP 10–14, especially in the adoption of the intervention, community mobilization, and intervention delivery stages. Further studies should combine contexts, mechanisms, and results for a broad understanding of the effectiveness of this intervention in the public sector.
Licença:: © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17196979
Collection(s) :Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Affichage détaillé " class="statisticsLink btn btn-primary" href="/jspui/handle/10482/39790/statistics">



Tous les documents dans DSpace sont protégés par copyright, avec tous droits réservés.