Skip navigation
Veuillez utiliser cette adresse pour citer ce document : http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/33646
Fichier(s) constituant ce document :
Fichier TailleFormat 
ARTIGO_DepositionParaguayanPresident .pdf1,12 MBAdobe PDFVoir/Ouvrir
Titre: The deposition of Paraguayan president Fernando Lugo and its repercussions in South American regional organizations
Auteur(s): Jatobá, Daniel
Luciano, Bruno Theodoro
Assunto:: Paraguai. Presidente (2008- 2012 : Fernando Lugo)
MERCOSUL
União de Nações Sul-Americanas
Paraguai - política e governo
Date de publication: 2018
Editeur: Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
Référence bibliographique: JATOBA, Daniel; LUCIANO, Bruno Theodoro. The Deposition of Paraguayan President Fernando Lugo and its repercussions in South American regional organizations. Bras. Brazilian Political Science Review, São Paulo, v. 12, n. 1, e0006, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800010006. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212018000100204&lng=en&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 13 fev. 2019. Epub Mar 26, 2018.
Abstract: In June 2012, the Paraguayan Parliament executed a procedure that removed President Fernando Lugo from office. Since 1993, only two presidents have completed their mandates, Juan Carlos Wasmosy (1993-1998) and Nicanor Duarte Frutos (2003-2008). With the exception of the latter, all elected presidents have faced either successful or attempted coups, mostly organized by the military. In the case of Lugo, South American governments reacted by suspending Paraguay from two regional organizations (Unasur and Mercosur). This article has two main objectives: 01. to provide an interpretation of Fernando Lugo's deposition, in the context of the ongoing instability of Paraguay's democratic regime, as well as other similar cases in South America; and 02. to analyze the regional repercussions of the interruption of Lugo's presidential mandate, in particular the reactions from other South American governments and the ramifications for three Mercosur institutions: the Common Market Council (CMC), the Mercosur Parliament (Parlasur), and the Permanent Review Tribunal (TPR). It is argued that, despite the involvement of the parliamentary and judicial institutions of the bloc in the Paraguayan case, the governments have prevailed in both the suspension and reincorporation of Paraguay to the bloc, reinforcing both the intergovernmental nature of these regional initiatives and the prominence of national executives in regional decision-making.
metadata.dc.description.unidade: Instituto de Relações Internacionais (IREL)
Licença:: This publication is registered under a CC-BY Licence.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800010006
Collection(s) :Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Affichage détaillé " class="statisticsLink btn btn-primary" href="/jspui/handle/10482/33646/statistics">



Tous les documents dans DSpace sont protégés par copyright, avec tous droits réservés.