Skip navigation
Universidade de Brasília
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/51373
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_PerceptionsGovernmentGuidance.pdf474,42 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorWild, Cervantée E. K.-
dc.contributor.authorConceição, Maria Inês Gandolfo-
dc.contributor.authorIwakuma, Miho-
dc.contributor.authorLewis-Jackson, Sasha-
dc.contributor.authorToyomoto, Rie-
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Alicia Regina Navarro Dias de-
dc.contributor.authorMahtani-Chugani, Vinita-
dc.contributor.authorSato, Rika Sakuma-
dc.contributor.authorRai, Tanvi-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-16T14:07:52Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-16T14:07:52Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-
dc.identifier.citationWILD, Cervantée E. K. et al. Perceptions of government guidance and citizen responses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-country analysis. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, [S. l.], v. 4, 100308, Dec. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100308. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321523000926?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 16 jan. 2025.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/51373-
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.pt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.titlePerceptions of government guidance and citizen responses during the COVID-19 pandemic : a cross-country analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordCovid-19pt_BR
dc.subject.keywordEstudo comparativopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordGovernopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordPacientespt_BR
dc.rights.licenseThis is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100308pt_BR
dc.description.abstract1The public perception of government approaches to pandemic management has played an important role in citizen responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the state and associated health institutions should feasibly be sources of epistemic authority, the pandemic has undermined their legitimacy as anti-science rhetoric proliferated and ‘fake news’ spread rapidly. In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of interviews with citizens across four different countries and explore how a lack of consistency and clarity in public health guidance from government and other trusted institutions led to a polarisation in public perceptions and mixed understandings of the pandemic. Using interview data collected across Brazil, Japan, Spain and the United Kingdom, we explored whether there were differences in the extent to which both state governments and scientific institutions were perceived as epistemic authorities through managing the pandemic. Participants grappled with a distrust of government guidelines, finding alternative sources of information to manage perceived infection risk, and make decisions around self-medication. Our analysis suggests several components were key to maintaining trust – and therefore epistemic authority – during the pandemic: reliability of the information delivered by different government bodies, including clarity of messaging; reliability of the government bodies themselves, including whether officials conducted themselves appropriately; and honesty about claims to expertise, including communicating when the scientific evidence was unclear or inconclusive. Our data suggests that honest communication about the limits of their knowledge would assist governments in engendering trust among citizens, and theoretically, compliance with public health guidelines.pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5377-6222pt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciencespt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Institute of Psychology, Graduate Program in Clinical Psychology and Culturept_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationKyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Medical Communicationpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japanpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciencespt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationKyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Health Promotion and Human Behaviourpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japanpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazilpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationResearch Unit University Hospital Nuestra Señora de Candelaria and Primary Care Management, Ctra. Gral. del Rosario, 145, 38010, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spainpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationDIPEx-Japan, 3-5-9 Higashi-Nihonbashi, Ichikawa Bldg 2nd Fl, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1030004, Japanpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciencespt_BR
dc.description.unidadeInstituto de Psicologia (IP)pt_BR
dc.description.unidadeDepartamento de Psicologia Clínica (IP PCL)pt_BR
dc.description.ppgPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Clínica e Culturapt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.