| Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Stavale, Rafaelly | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ferreira, Graziani Izidoro | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Galvão, João Antônio Martins | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zicker, Fábio | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Novaes, Maria Rita Carvalho Garbi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Oliveira, César Messias de | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Guilhem, Dirce Bellezi | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-20T17:55:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-20T17:55:23Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-04-15 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | STAVALE, Rafaelly et al. Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: a systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions. Plos One, [S. l.], 15 abr. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214272. Disponível em: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214272. Acesso em: 20 out. 2024. | pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/50622 | - |
| dc.language.iso | eng | pt_BR |
| dc.publisher | Plos One | pt_BR |
| dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | pt_BR |
| dc.title | Research misconduct in health and life sciences research : a systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions | pt_BR |
| dc.type | Artigo | pt_BR |
| dc.subject.keyword | Análise de citação | pt_BR |
| dc.subject.keyword | Má conduta científica | pt_BR |
| dc.subject.keyword | Integridade científica | pt_BR |
| dc.subject.keyword | Periódicos científicos | pt_BR |
| dc.subject.keyword | Medicina e ciências da saúde | pt_BR |
| dc.rights.license | Copyright: © 2019 Stavale et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214272 | pt_BR |
| dc.description.abstract1 | Background
Measures to ensure research integrity have been widely discussed due to the social, eco nomic and scientific impact of research integrity. In the past few years, financial support
for health research in emerging countries has steadily increased, resulting in a growing num ber of scientific publications. These achievements, however, have been accompanied by a
rise in retracted publications followed by concerns about the quality and reliability of such
publications.
Objective
This systematic review aimed to investigate the profile of medical and life sciences research
retractions from authors affiliated with Brazilian academic institutions. The chronological
trend between publication and retraction date, reasons for the retraction, citation of the
article after the retraction, study design, and the number of retracted publications by author
and affiliation were assessed. Additionally, the quality, availability and accessibility of data
regarding retracted papers from the publishers are described.
Methods
Two independent reviewers searched for articles that had been retracted since 2004 via
PubMed, Web of Science, Biblioteca Virtual em Sau´de (BVS) and Google Scholar data bases. Indexed keywords from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Descritores em
Ciências da Sau´de (DeCS) in Portuguese, English or Spanish were used. Data were also
collected from the Retraction Watch website (www.retractionwatch.com). This study was
registered with the PROSPERO systematic review database (CRD42017071647). A final sample of 65 articles was retrieved from 55 different journals with reported impact fac tors ranging from 0 to 32.86, with a median value of 4.40 and a mean of 4.69. The types of
documents found were erratum (1), retracted articles (3), retracted articles with a retraction
notice (5), retraction notices with erratum (3), and retraction notices (45). The assessment
of the Retraction Watch website added 8 articles that were not identified by the search strat egy using the bibliographic databases. The retracted publications covered a wide range of
study designs. Experimental studies (40) and literature reviews (15) accounted for 84.6% of
the retracted articles. Within the field of health and life sciences, medical science was the
field with the largest number of retractions (34), followed by biological sciences (17). Some
articles were retracted for at least two distinct reasons (13). Among the retrieved articles,
plagiarism was the main reason for retraction (60%). Missing data were found in 57% of the
retraction notices, which was a limitation to this review. In addition, 63% of the articles were
cited after their retraction.
Conclusion
Publications are not retracted solely for research misconduct but also for honest error. Nev ertheless, considering authors affiliated with Brazilian institutions, this review concluded that
most of the retracted health and life sciences publications were retracted due to research
misconduct. Because the number of publications is the most valued indicator of scientific
productivity for funding and career progression purposes, a systematic effort from the
national research councils, funding agencies, universities and scientific journals is needed
to avoid an escalating trend of research misconduct. More investigations are needed to
comprehend the underlying factors of research misconduct and its increasing manifestation. | pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7967-1821 | pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9751-7430 | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Brasilia, College of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Brasilia, College of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Telecomunicações do Brasil – Telebrás, Department of Statistics | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Center for Technological Development in Health | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Health Sciences Education and Research Foundation – ESCS/Fepecs, College of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Brasilia, College of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing | pt_BR |
| dc.description.unidade | Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde (FS) | pt_BR |
| dc.description.unidade | Departamento de Enfermagem (FS ENF) | pt_BR |
| dc.description.ppg | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde | pt_BR |
| dc.description.ppg | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem | - |
| Aparece nas coleções: | Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins
|
