Skip navigation
Universidade de Brasília
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/48630
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorVaz, Juliana Maria de Albuquerque-
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Bárbara Manuella Cardoso Sodré-
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Djane B.-
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Luciene Alves Moreira-
dc.contributor.authorSantana, Rafael Santos-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-09T14:07:01Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-09T14:07:01Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-
dc.identifier.citationVAZ, Juliana M. A. et al. Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method. Cephalalgia, [S. l.], v.42, n. 3, p. 239-249, mar. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211037297.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/48630-
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.titleQuality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s methodpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordDor de cabeçapt_BR
dc.subject.keywordCuidados de saúde baseados em evidênciaspt_BR
dc.subject.keywordDiretrizes clínicaspt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211037297pt_BR
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03331024211037297pt_BR
dc.description.abstract1Objective: To evaluate the quality of existing clinical practice guidelines for headache management and their main recommendations. Background: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have been developed to support the clinical decision-making. However, to achieve this goal, the quality of these guidelines must be ensured. Methods: A systematic search for clinical practice guidelines for headache management was conducted in the PubMed database, in websites of known guideline developers and in websites of known headache associations. The quality appraisal was performed through the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II method. Results: Twelve guidelines were evaluated. The domains of rigor of development, applicability, and editorial independence, which most influence the overall quality of guidelines, had the lowest average scores and the highest standard deviation rates (61% 23; 37% 20; 53% 31). The main recommendations regarding medication use for acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache and migraine in adult patients consisted of paracetamol, acetylsalicylic acid, and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in all guidelines. Conclusions: The statistical results indicate that the appraised guidelines have room for both individual and collective improvement. In addition, there is a well-established medication recommendation pattern among all guidelines evaluated.pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-2837pt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasíliapt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasíliapt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasíliapt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Alfenaspt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasíliapt_BR
dc.description.unidadeFaculdade de Ciências da Saúde (FS)pt_BR
dc.description.unidadeDepartamento de Farmácia (FS FAR)pt_BR
Aparece en las colecciones: Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem " class="statisticsLink btn btn-primary" href="/jspui/handle/10482/48630/statistics">



Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.