Skip navigation
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/48003
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_Assessing3DDigital.pdf3,96 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFeitosa, Francisco Renato Fernandes-
dc.contributor.authorFragelli, Ricardo Ramos-
dc.contributor.authorSouto, Virginia Tiradentes-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T11:34:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-19T11:34:09Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationFEITOSA, Francisco Renato Fernandes; FRAGELLI, Ricardo Ramos; SOUTO, Virginia Tiradentes. Assessing a 3D digital prototype for teaching the Brazilian sign language alphabet: an alternative for non-programming designers. Journal of Digital Media & Interaction, [S. l. ], v. 6, n. 15, 2023. DOI: https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/jdmi/article/view/32059. Disponível em: https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/jdmi/article/view/32059. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2024.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/48003-
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/jdmi/article/view/32059pt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.titleAssessing a 3D digital prototype for teaching the Brazilian sign language alphabet : an alternative for non-programming designerspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordConcepções pedagógicaspt_BR
dc.subject.keywordMultimídia educativapt_BR
dc.subject.keywordintérprete animado 3Dpt_BR
dc.rights.license© 2023 Francisco Renato Fernandes Feitosa, Ricardo Ramos Fragelli, Virgínia Tiradentes Souto. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.34624/jdmi.v6i15.32059pt_BR
dc.description.abstract1This study aims to analyse the users’ perceptions about a 3D digital artifacts prototype for teaching the fingerspelling alphabet of Brazilian Sign Language (LIBRAS). For this purpose, a high-fidelity prototype was developed with a non-programming method, and a usability test was conducted using a structured questionnaire with 31 participants, including Deaf and hearing people. Most users (96.7%) rated the learning experience with the tool as positive, with 67.7% rating the experience as "good", 12.9% as "very good", and 16.1% as "excellent". Comparing the evaluation between Deaf and hearing people showed that both target groups mostly rated it positively. However, most hearing people rated it "good," while the majority of the Deaf rated it as "excellent" (29%) or "outstanding" (14%) compared to 13% and 12%, respectively, among the hearing. In summary, considering the variables presented, the experience was well rated and did not encounter solid obstacles or resistance.pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-6601pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6548-1154pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7576-2876pt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Brasilia, Post Graduation Program of Designpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Brasilia, Post Graduation Program of Designpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Brasilia, Post Graduation Program of Designpt_BR
dc.description.ppgPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Designpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.