Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
dc.contributor.author | Feitosa, Francisco Renato Fernandes | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fragelli, Ricardo Ramos | - |
dc.contributor.author | Souto, Virginia Tiradentes | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-19T11:34:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-19T11:34:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | FEITOSA, Francisco Renato Fernandes; FRAGELLI, Ricardo Ramos; SOUTO, Virginia Tiradentes. Assessing a 3D digital prototype for teaching the Brazilian sign language alphabet: an alternative for non-programming designers. Journal of Digital Media & Interaction, [S. l. ], v. 6, n. 15, 2023. DOI: https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/jdmi/article/view/32059. Disponível em: https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/jdmi/article/view/32059. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2024. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/48003 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/jdmi/article/view/32059 | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | pt_BR |
dc.title | Assessing a 3D digital prototype for teaching the Brazilian sign language alphabet : an alternative for non-programming designers | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo | pt_BR |
dc.subject.keyword | Concepções pedagógicas | pt_BR |
dc.subject.keyword | Multimídia educativa | pt_BR |
dc.subject.keyword | intérprete animado 3D | pt_BR |
dc.rights.license | © 2023 Francisco Renato Fernandes Feitosa, Ricardo Ramos Fragelli, Virgínia Tiradentes Souto. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.34624/jdmi.v6i15.32059 | pt_BR |
dc.description.abstract1 | This study aims to analyse the users’ perceptions about a 3D digital artifacts prototype for teaching the
fingerspelling alphabet of Brazilian Sign Language (LIBRAS). For this purpose, a high-fidelity prototype
was developed with a non-programming method, and a usability test was conducted using a structured
questionnaire with 31 participants, including Deaf and hearing people. Most users (96.7%) rated the
learning experience with the tool as positive, with 67.7% rating the experience as "good", 12.9% as
"very good", and 16.1% as "excellent". Comparing the evaluation between Deaf and hearing people
showed that both target groups mostly rated it positively. However, most hearing people rated it "good,"
while the majority of the Deaf rated it as "excellent" (29%) or "outstanding" (14%) compared to 13% and
12%, respectively, among the hearing. In summary, considering the variables presented, the
experience was well rated and did not encounter solid obstacles or resistance. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-6601 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6548-1154 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7576-2876 | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Brasilia, Post Graduation Program of Design | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Brasilia, Post Graduation Program of Design | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Brasilia, Post Graduation Program of Design | pt_BR |
dc.description.ppg | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Design | pt_BR |
Aparece nas coleções: | Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins
|