Skip navigation
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/28987
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_CurrentPerceptionThreshold.pdf1,13 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Henrique Resendept_BR
dc.contributor.authorZanetti, Renatopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPaz, Clarissa Cardoso dos Santos Coutopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorManzano, Gilberto Mastrocolapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorTierra-Criollo, Carlos Juliopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-07T05:03:50Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-07T05:03:50Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationMARTINS, Henrique Resende et al. Current perception threshold and reaction time in the assessment of sensory peripheral nerve fibers through sinusoidal electrical stimulation at different frequencies. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica, Rio de Janeiro, v. 29, n. 3, p. 278-285, set. 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbeb.2013.028. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-31512013000300008. Acesso em: 04 ago. 2020.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/28987-
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherSBEB - Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédicapt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.titleCurrent perception threshold and reaction time in the assessment of sensory peripheral nerve fibers through sinusoidal electrical stimulation at different frequenciespt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordSensorespt_BR
dc.subject.keywordTempo de reaçãopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordPercepçãopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordSistema nervoso centralpt_BR
dc.subject.keywordNeuropatia periféricapt_BR
dc.rights.licenseRevista Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica - (CC BY-NC) - All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. Fonte: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-31512013000300008. Acesso em: 04 ago. 2020.-
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbeb.2013.028pt_BR
dc.description.abstract1INTRODUCTION: The Perception Sensory Threshold (ST) for sinusoidal current stimuli at 5, 250, and 2,000 Hz is commonly used in the assessment of peripheral nerve fibers (C, Aδ, and Aβ, respectively). However, the neuroselectivity of these frequencies is far from consensus. In addition, Reaction Time (RT) measurements suggest that 2,000 Hz stimuli excite Aβ-fibers, 250 Hz Aβ- or Aδ-fibers, as well as 5 Hz Aβ-, Aδ- or C-fibers. Therefore, we suppose that the sinusoidal current neuroselectivity may be better observed if ST and RT parameters are jointly evaluated. In addition, we have investigated whether there are other sets of frequencies that could be used. METHODS: Thus this work investigates ST and RT for stimuli with frequency ranging from 1 to 3,000 Hz, on 28 healthy subjects aged from 19 to 44 years old (27.1±5.49). ST and RT dissimilarity among different frequencies was evaluated applying bi-dimensional Fisher Quadratic Discriminant. RESULTS: The lowest classification error (3.6%) was obtained for 1, 250, and 3,000 Hz. Error for 5, 250, and 2,000Hz was 16.7%. Stimulation frequency at 1 Hz evoked more sensations related to C-fibers (53% of reports) than to Aβ-fibers (36%). However, this behavior did not repeat itself at 5 Hz (only 21% of perceptions were related to C-fibers against 64% to Aβ-fibers). Sensations related to Aβ-fibers prevailed for the highest frequencies presented to the subjects (2,000 Hz - 82% and 3,000 Hz - 93%). Mean RT values showed a decreasing trend with frequency. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that frequencies 1, 250, and 3,000 Hz are more neuroselective than 5, 250, and 2,000 Hz for the evaluation of peripheral sensitive fibers. Furthermore, they show RT usefulness.-
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.